Watercolour workshop (1) 2014

We braved the hottest day of the German summer 2014, found out that some cookies can as well be drunk as eaten, avoided the two bunny problem, discussed an Elven hair-braiding phalanx (“Leeeft turn! Braid!”) and generally painted the Schmendrick way (“Paint, do as you will!”)

Thanks to a few very thoughtful participants, we didn’t have to paint in enemy territory either. XD

(Workshop brought to you by Daniel Smith. And Schmincke. And Winsor/Newton and Lukas and Tintoretto and Van Gogh.)

It’s been another lovely weekend with you fantastic people.  Looking forward to next week with more fantastic people!

Thoughts about crowdfunding for graphic and written projects

There are a lot of guidelines with regard to crowdfunding, but very few that are geared towards the large and diverse sector of artists, comic artists, and writers that try to fund their projects through crowdfunding sites.

Granted, this group can sometimes have a hard time with crowdfunding. After all, there are publishers for graphic novels and literature, right? Comic and writing projects seem to fail on a far more regular basis, and far more spectacularly, than others. People may not be willing to crowdfund something that you might just as well realise through a regular publishing house.

 

Why Crowdfunding?

I predict that you will get people whining about you going for crowdfunding, and the bottom line will be: “I gathered rejections from publishers, and so should you! If your project wasn’t picked up by a publisher, it’s obviously crap. Why should I pay for it? (Not that I would want to pay anyway; I just want to whine. Make that, Why are you trying to make ignorant people pay for it?)”

Be prepared to either ignore or matter-of-factly answer such comments. In my case, it was relatively easy; I had anticipated the sour grapes people and included a section on “Why Crowdfunding” in my campaign description, so that most of the time, other people were already jumping in to explain to the whiners why I had to go crowdfunding before I even read their comments. But even if you’re not doing a 140 page picture book for adults on military history that no publisher will touch with a ten-foot pole, there is one huge, huge argument for crowdfunding that several big industry names have discovered too:

With crowdfunding, you put your own project into action. You don’t have to take any hassle from publishers, illustrators, editors (though you should get in good feedback of course!) but you can do exactly what you want to do. And for goodness’ sake, if someone thinks that crowdfunding is evil, then let them. Nobody is ever forced to participate in crowdfunding. Last I heard.

 

Some Dos and Don’ts

In preparation for my own campaign, an illustrated novel about the battle of Cannae in 216 BC, I browsed dozens of guides, and hundreds of projects. Together with a friend, we tried to find the reasons why they succeeded – and more interestingly, why they failed. Failure is far easier to predict than success. The good thing is that with most failures, you can actually get an idea why.

 

Consider these projects:

 

Project A

Name behind it: little-known

Artwork and outset: Brilliant

Concept and originality: great

Impression of campaign site: professional

Goal: 40,000

Goal met: No (12,000)

Killer: Little-known person and too-high goal, even if everything else looks absolutely terrific. A lot of people did donate, so a lot of people wanted to see this happen; it was just that the approach didn’t work like this.

 

Project B

Name behind it: no-name

Artwork and outset: pretty good

Concept and originality: good

Impression of campaign site: wtf did I just read?

Goal: 12,000

Goal met: No (zero support)

Bottom line: Someone with a great style asking for a lot of money and leaves you with no idea what it was all about anyway – go figure.

 

Project C

Name behind it: loads of celebs

Artwork and outset: pretty good

Concept and originality: not quite sure

Impression of campaign site: I have no idea what they’re even doing, but the video is funny as hell

Goal: 50,000

Goal met: Yes; overshot by 200%

Bottom line: If you’re a celeb, people will flock to whatever you do.

 

The bottom line of most failed comic/graphics(literature projects that I have seen were too-high goals and unclear campaign pages. On most campaign pages that advertised solid work, did not target a non-existent market, did a good job describing what they were doing and then managed to recruit a lot of people who helped with their project, and lastly asked for a sensible amount of money (around 3,000 for a print run), they usually reached their goals.

Since most of us are not celebs, Iet’s take a look at what factors go into a crowdfunding campaign.

 

Before you decide to go crowdfunding:

Know your network. Who of your own network will contribute? If you don’t know, chances are nobody will. You need quite a home crowd before you start, because…

The crowdfunding platform will barely generate any traffic for you if you don’t direct it there! This was what surprised me most when I started my campaign. I don’t think I’m alone in my earlier belief that you put your project online and people will notice it and donate. They will not. 98% of my supporters in the first three weeks were people I either know personally or on-line, and who also know me. It was only after the first three weeks or so that the project attracted total strangers in greater numbers, and that probably happened because of the momentum that the project already had thanks to my “home crowd” (in Germany, we say the devil always sh*ts on the largest pile). If you’re not a celebrity OR unless your project is something people will wonder how they managed to live without (e. g., a blowjob machine), it’s incredibly difficult to attract strangers to pay for your dreams. This means…

The platform is not very important. I agonised over going for Indiegogo or going through a huge amount of hassle to get into Kickstarter (which is hard for non-US or UK residents). I don’t know – maybe, with Kickstarter, I’d have made 20,000. But somehow, I doubt it. Indiegogo got me almost 600% all right. Picking a well-known platform that looks trustworthy and respectable is probably a smart choice, but other than that, you direct your traffic, and then maybe others will pick up, but the platform is negligible. I chose Indiegogo for two reasons: (1) It had this flexible payment plan that lets you keep the money you gathered even if you don’t reach your goal, and (2) Indigo is one of my favourite colours for painting.

So, if the platform hardly matters…

Build an audience. And even if you think you’ve built one, build a bigger one. This is months or years of work. I thought a thousand Facebook fans on my project would be enough. Only about 2 per cent of those actually supported the campaign. And that is still a lot – of my tens of thousands of deviantArt watchers, 0.1 per cent donated for Cannae. Likes and faves are cheap. People who don’t know you, even if they’re fired up for your project, are about fifty times less likely to give you any money than a friend who likes you and wants you to succeed, even if he’s not that much into the project itself! This was the most amazing bottom line from my Indiegogo experience.

My friends, on the other hand, completely surprised me. I knew they were a supportive and wonderful bunch, but I thought that they would not really be interested in military history. How wrong I was. They really kicked off the entire campaign to its fantastic start within the first few hours, and Facebook was a huge help with that – it really was like hanging out with a whole crowd and all celebrating together. I’ve seen projects succeeding without Facebook connection on the creators’ part; in my case, I’m sure that would not have worked.

If you’re a well-known cartoonist or graphic artist who does a project that all of your fans will love, it’ll be much easier. In my case, 90% percent of my deviantArt watchers are probably still angry with me for turning to Hannibal and neglecting Tolkien. ;)

Be realistic. Too-high goals are the most common reason for graphic and literature projects to fail. It actually makes sense to set your goal to less than you actually need. A smaller amount looks more easily possible, and people might not donate at all if they see that, after one week out of five, you’re at 500€ out of 50,000. Plus, on Indiegogo, you pay smaller fees if you reach your goal (4%), and higher ones if you don’t (9%). What I did was set the amount to the absolute minimum that would not leave me with a gaping hole in the family budget once Cannae went to print, and I hoped I might make more than that.

Covering the cost of a print edition will probably work. Finding people who will finance a well-off lifestyle for you while you do something you love for a full year sounds great but probably won’t work. Paying an artist for a year’s labour is noble but the goal is too high in most cases, and people might wonder why they should give you something that nobody will ever give them though they’d like it just as much. Something that rarely seems to work either is a 40,000 goal that covers professional editing, a marketing budget, etc. These might work for big industry names, but hardly for regular guys like you and me, unless it’s something that many people will feel emotionally attached to even if you don’t know you. This is true for a child with cancer, but not for an illustrated novel on an ancient battle.

Or you could…

Split your goal. Run several campaigns, and build on each previous one’s momentum. Then the above point might work.

 

When writing your campaign page and recording your video:

Be professional. Nobody expects you to make a polished video, but make sure the audio and video are clear and you come across as someone people will trust with their money.

Be yourself. Are you an engaging type who can really appeal to people? Or do you prefer to stay in the background? Plan your video accordingly.

Spend time on working out your campaign page. The time you put into compiling your descriptions will show. No video, and a description that you obviously put together in fifteen minutes is almost a guarantee that your campaign will fail. If you can’t bother to put work into presenting yourself, then it’s quite obvious that you can’t bother to put work into the product either.

Be redundant. Many people won’t watch your video, while others won’t look beyond it. Put all the important information both in the video and in the text.

Use images.

Be clear. Where is the money going to? If you want to raise an above-average amount, make sure you tell people what it’s for! Most successful crowdfunding projects I’ve seen calculate with little personal profit. People expect to see you make something cool, but they’ll be more reluctant to make you filthy rich.

Be precise. Use graphics, charts, photos, images for important information. Not a wall of text (unlike most of this post. I’m sorry. But hey, it’s not as if I wanted you to buy anything here. XD)

If your project has anything to do with writing, edit. Nothing is as off-putting as a badly-written description of literature.

If your project is about your writing, include examples of your writing. This should go without saying, but I have rarely seen a single writing project on crowdfunding platforms where you didn’t buy a complete cat in a bag. People will rarely pre-order a book no matter how cool your story is, unless you give them a taste of what you can do.

Even more of a no-brainer, but you still see projects that don’t do it: if your project is about your artwork… show some of your artwork. And not just one image. People want to get a feel for what they’re supporting. Test pages are the best way to show them what you want them to help you with.

The three above points are, in my experience, the most common factors why projects fail to reach even modest goals (or dwindle at the dreaded zero support for weeks). In the self-publishing world, you can’t allow yourself to put a half-arsed project online. Make it as professional-looking as you possibly can. Rise above the self-publishing chaff. But don’t come across as a big-headed twit. That is off-putting too. I have seen campaigns fail simply because their creators looked like terribly big-headed twits.

 

When devising your perks:

Ask around what people actually want. What would you want? What would you pay for it? Honestly?

Custom-tailor your perks. What kinds of people might donate? What sort of perk title would appeal to them? What would be off-putting? Name and describe them accordingly. (Fun example: I took a lot of time deciding what to call my “prime perk” – the signed copy. In the end, I thought that most of my readers would be fans of Roman history more than of Hannibal, and named it “Legionary” – and two people actually told me that they almost didn’t get it because they despised the Romans! One of them even got himself a Celtic Cavalryman too. To ride down his Legionary. XD Isn’t it fun when you can play with your food – sorry, perks?)

Add examples and pictures of perk items.igg_ex

Check what comparable books cost. Don’t overprice it.

Nobody will pay $1000 for a skype call with you unless you’re Hugh Jackman (or similar).

Perks that involve others need to be well planned. The cameo appearances in Darkness over Cannae were a lot of fun and a lot of work beyond the simple artwork, and while I had previously been able to do everything as a one woman show, I suddenly had to work with other people’s wishes and their schedules (it’s hard to send over reference pictures while you’re backpacking in Himalaya). This slows your work down. Don’t leave that out of your calculations.

 

Before your campaign:

Fine-tune your campaign. Check spelling.

Before you launch, get feedback on the campaign page. Preferably from extremely honest people who are not related to you, and from more than just one.

Walk the fine line between firing people up and getting on everyone’s nerves. Warn your Facebook friends that you’re going to be rather obnoxious over the next few weeks. Most of them will understand.

You find this in all the crowdfunding how-to’s, and I didn’t believe it, but: make your run-time short and sweet. The common misconception is that the crowdfunding platform will give you loads of traffic, so the longer it’s on, the more money it’ll make. It doesn’t. Darkness over Cannae spent two weeks on Indiegogo’s start page, and it spent the entire duration of the campaign in the top slots in the “writing” category. Granted, it’s very nerdy business that doesn’t really attract fans all by its own, but during that time, I hardly got a single contributor who had stumbled across the project on Indiegogo (as opposed to twenty spam messages). Do you browse Crowdfunding platforms in search of random projects to support? Probably not. So the people who support you probably knew they would support you by the first week of the campaign. My run-time was fifty days, and that was at least two weeks too long. Keeping your campaign running, up to date and active during all this time is a lot of work that seriously drains you, especially if you’re running the campaign on your own. The lull in the middle was demoralising and could have been avoided – the end rush will just come sooner. And it will come. I’d be willing to bet that keeping my run-time much shorter would not have resulted in any significant drop in funding.

igg_curve

I set the campaign run-time so long because I couldn’t see the harm. But the truth is: It’s nerve-wrecking. My first few days, as you can well imagine (100% funded in thirteen hours) were dizzying. You interact, write thank you emails, take suggestions for stretch goals, devise them, and just DO STUFF that takes up an insane amount of time. Make sure you have that time. I never, ever expected this campaign to run so ridiculously well, so I was not really prepared for the work that would follow.

 

When your campaign is online:

Say thank you. I have contributed to six campaigns and got a personal email reply in one. Doesn’t make you feel appreciated.

Involve the audience, listen to their suggestions and put things up for debate if your project allows this. If it doesn’t allow it, ask yourself: Can I make it so? Crowdfunding works best if the crowd is actually a part of the stuff you do. They’re your crowd. They want to be. They bloody deserve this.

 

Postscript: What the Potato Salad can teach us.

I wrote this guide in the weeks before the famed Potato Salad Phenomenon. (In case you live on the backside of the moon or in Jülich-Barmen, it was about a guy making potato salad, asking $10; as I write, he’s past 40,000).

Most of my artist friends are seriously, seriously pissed at this guy. We struggle with making our dreams a reality, we try and fail to generate traffic, and this guy makes a fortune with friggin’ salad.

http://www.wordstream.com/images/attention-economy-zoidberg-why.png

Why?

Because he went viral. Okay. We all hope we do. Hardly any of us will. Is that all? Going viral?

No. Because the people backing him did not want any potato salad. (This should come as no surprise.) They wanted to be funny. And this is what the Potato Salad Incident can actually teach us: Many people will not support crowdfunding campaigns for the artist, but for themselves. Offer something they want. This can be a product, or it can be a feeling. The feeling of being smart or funny or, is this case, delightfully anti. I am not giving any money for world peace! Screw you, world! I am supporting potato salad!

 

Imbolc

First off, a huge thank you to everyone who supported the Indiegogo Campaign for Darkness over Cannae – you’re terrific. I’ll continue to separate stuff – everything Cannae-themed goes to darknessovercannae.com (apart from a few major updates every now and then), and the rest will be posted here.

This is a painting done for my mother’s seventieth birthday, which is in two weeks. She loves Celtic mythology and we both like druidic singer/songwriter Damh the Bard, so I illustrated his song “Brighid“.

In the song, a wanderer comes upon an old woman by a well in early February (Imbolc), and she tells him she was held captive by the Queen of Winter. As she talks, he sees her reflection in the well, and looking up, he beholds a maiden where the old woman has stood. The song has elements of the Ceiliagh and Brighid, two faces of the same goddess, who is reborn as a young maiden at the return of Spring.

Then I saw her reflection in the mirrored well, 
And I looked deep in her face, 
The old woman gone, a maiden now knelt in her place…

Imbolc

Imbolc


Here’s the reverse, and a detail shot:

wp_imbolc_col_2 wp_imbolc.detail

It’s a GO! Darkness over Cannae on Indiegogo!

Now’s the time! Help me get this book out there! Head over to Indiegogo and preorder the book, support the campaign, be part of the project!

doc_preview2

 

 

 

Cannae updates

Work on “Darkness over Cannae” is in full swing. I haven’t been this deliriously happy with anything I have done in… decades?!

 

Finished header image!

Finished header image!

Cornelius Lentulus.

Cornelius Lentulus.

Not from "Cannae": Hannibal, wounded during the siege of Saguntum.

Not from “Cannae”: Hannibal, wounded during the siege of Saguntum.

Hannibal and Maharbal on a small hill overlooking the field prior to battle

Hannibal and Maharbal on a small hill overlooking the field prior to battle

Double page illu: Balearic slingers

Double page illu: Balearic slingers

Layout test: the Romans break through

 

Check out the (updated!) Project Page: http://darknessovercannae.com/

Or follow it on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/DarknessOverCannae

Darkness over Cannae – Tie-in website now online!

Head over to DarknessOverCannae.com to see the website I’ve put together for the new project! It’s like a tie-in appendix for the upcoming novel, with loads of goodies, artwork (more to come), and all sorts of thoughts concerning the Battle of Cannae.

If you know anyone who might be interested in the project, please share it! :)

battle_header_provi2

Also on Facebook!

Darkness over Cannae – some impressions

Work on “Darkness over Cannae” is well underway. I now know it’ll be an illustrated novel – a bit like Neil Gaiman’s Stardust in form (highly recommended, by the way!) – of probably around 120-150 pages.

It’s all set on this one fateful day – August 2nd, 216 BC – spanning an hour before dawn to a few hours after sunset, from the perspectives of six men, three Roman and three Carthaginian.

I’ve been doing some sketching, but the more finalised images and of course, greater portions of the text will not be online until the thing is done. Until then, here’s some impressions!

Maharbal, Hannibal's second in command.

Maharbal, Hannibal’s second in command. Quick sketch with a splash of watercolour.

Top: Hasdrubal, commander of the Punic heavy cavalry. Writing him is an indecent amount of fun due to his sense of wry humour. Bottom: Bomilkar, captain of Hannibal's bodyguard.

Top: Hasdrubal, commander of the Punic heavy cavalry. Writing him is an almost indecent amount of fun due to his wry sense of humour. Bottom: Bomilkar, captain of Hannibal’s bodyguard.

“Either Varro is smart – and conservative – enough to keep his line close together, which enables us to envelope him on the wings. Or he’s innovative – and dumb – enough to deploy in a long line to encircle us; in which case we’re more likely to break through his centre as it bumbles along than he is to break through ours. We’ll see. For the moment, however, we’ll assume he is smart and conservative, and the original plan remains the same as ever, in its main points.” Hannibal positioned the six Roman infantry rectangles as a neat, solid line with spaces between the blocks, then looked at each of the men assembled in turn and went on, sombrely, “At the risk of boring you into a stupor, here are the details again. If you want to, sing along; it can’t hurt.”

“It will, if I do,” Hasdrubal growled. Hanno chuckled; Mago snorted.

Top: After the battle, Hannibal kneels at the Aufidus, cleansing himself before praying. Bottom: Aemilius Paullus and Terentius Varro, the ill-fated consuls at Cannae.

“Terentius.” Paullus hastened after him, holding his colleague by the arm, speaking in a low voice. “Let us not fight on the right bank, at least. It favours his cavalry too much.”

“You don’t want to fight on level ground for your fear of his cavalry. You don’t want to fight on rough terrain for your fear of ambushes.” Varro had come to a halt in the semi-privacy of the tent entrance. “Where, in your opinion, should we give battle? At the bottom of the sea? Or on treetops?”

“In a place where we know he can’t stage an ambush, and that we have controlled for about a week before he gets there!” Paullus answered between his teeth. “He has been here for weeks! What do you think he has been doing?”

“Such a situation will never happen!” Varro’s face was red with contained anger. “We cannot force him to fight. That much is clear. The gods know why he even wants to fight here, outnumbered as he is! We need to take this chance, and beat him now, before he can come to his senses! Aemilius, why won’t you see it – Hannibal has finally made a mistake. We finally have him where we want him, and we can finally end this. And by Jupiter Stator, I will. It’s the great deeds and courage of our ancestors that have made Rome great. Not hesitating, not hiding, and certainly not bickering!”

First ink test. Not exactly what I wanted - too clean.

First ink test. Not exactly what I wanted – too clean.

Second ink test – NOW we’re talking! Aemilius Paullus in the last moments of his life.

Servilius Geminus was dead, hacked to pieces by several Iberian swords at once. Furius Bibaculus was dying, run through with a spear. The legates’ bodyguards were just being cut down along with them. Lentulus had drifted into view and out again, shouting at him, but the words had made no sense. Claudius Centho was dead, defending the consul, who was in a state of shock and utter disbelief.

Aemilius Paullus had left the dying right flank, only to die in the centre.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,865 other followers

%d bloggers like this: